MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068051936 · doi:10.1029/1999gl008461

Effect of grain size and domain state on thermal demagnetization tails

2000· article· en· W2068051936 on OpenAlexaff
David J. Dunlop, Özden Özdemir

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Canadian institutionsAurora CollegeUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemagnetizing fieldMagnetiteGeologyRemanenceMineralogyGrain sizeThermoremanent magnetizationMaterials scienceCondensed matter physicsPhysicsMagnetic fieldGeomorphologyMagnetization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermal demagnetization of viscous remanence (VRM) and partial thermoremanence (pTRM) of 20‐ and 135‐µm natural magnetites reveals a broad spectrum f(T UB ) of unblocking temperatures T UB , both > and < T B , the blocking temperature. In contrast, 0.04‐µm single‐domain (SD) grains demagnetize sharply at T UB ≈ T B . High‐ and low‐T UB tails of f(T UB ) were wider for 135‐µm multidomain (MD) grains than for 20‐µm PSD grains. 10‐mT alternating‐field demagnetization rendered the VRM of the 20‐µm magnetite more SD‐like in subsequent thermal cleaning, selectively erasing both low‐ and high‐T UB tails of f(T UB ). Primary and secondary remanences are then cleanly separated, and non‐linear Thellier paleointensity determination becomes linear. Our results agree well with (T B , T UB ) data for 10 5 ‐year thermoviscous overprints in the Milton Monzonite over the range of log(time) common to the two studies. Because (T UB ) av ≈ T B for PSD and MD as well as SD grains, the Pullaiah et al. paleothermometry method will work if (T UB ) av values are used instead of (T UB ) max values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations90
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesFrench-language works237,207