Lineage Targeted MHC-II Transgenic Mice Demonstrate the Role of Dendritic Cells in Bacterial-driven Colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) pathogenesis involves an inadequately controlled immune reaction to intestinal microbiota, and CD4(+) T cells, dependent on MHC class II (MHC-II) processing and presentation by antigen-presenting cells (APC), play important roles. The role of professional APC (macrophages and dendritic cells [DCs]) and nonprofessional APC (intestinal epithelial cells [IECs]) in microbial-driven intestinal inflammation remains controversial. METHODS: We generated transgenic animals on an MHC-II(-/-) genetic background in which MHC-II is expressed on 1) DC via the CD11c promoter (CD11cTg) or 2) IEC via the fatty acid binding protein (liver) promoter (EpithTg). These mice were crossed with Rag2(-/-) mice to eliminate T and B cells (CD11cTg/Rag2(-/-) and EpithTg/Rag2(-/-)). Helicobacter bilis (Hb) infection and adoptive transfer (AT) of naïve CD4 T cells were used to trigger IBD. RESULTS: CD11cTg/Rag2(-/-) mice infected with Hb+AT developed severe colitis within 3 weeks post-AT, similar to disease in positive control Rag2(-/-) mice infected with Hb+AT. CD11cTg/Rag2(-/-) mice given AT alone or Hb alone had significantly less severe colitis. In contrast, EpithTg/Rag2(-/-) mice infected with Hb+AT developed mild colitis by 3 weeks and even after 16 weeks post-AT had only mild lesions. CONCLUSIONS: MHC-II expression restricted to DCs is sufficient to induce severe colitis in the presence of T cells and a microorganism such as Hb within 3 weeks of AT. Expression of MHC-II solely on IEC in the presence of a microbial trigger and T cells was insufficient to trigger severe colitis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".