MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068103905 · doi:10.1071/rdv25n1ab311

311 SUPEROVULATION OF NORTH AMERICAN BISON WITH TWO INJECTIONS OF FOLLICLE-STIMULATING HORMONE

2012· article· en· W2068103905 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jennifer P. Barfield, G.E. Seidel

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBison bisonCorpus luteumEstrous cycleProstaglandinAnimal scienceAndrologyBiologyHormoneInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Few studies have examined superovulation of North American Bison. In cattle, ovarian superstimulation is usually achieved with 6 to 8 injections of FSH at half-day intervals. However, handling bison repeatedly stresses the animals, which could adversely affect their reproductive potential, as well as pose a risk of injury to the bison and handlers. To limit the number of times the bison were handled, we tested a two-injection superovulation scheme using sodium hyaluronate (MAP-5, Bioniche Animal Health Inc., Belleville, Ontario, Canada) in the FSH diluent, which serves to slow the absorption of FSH when given IM. We hypothesised that the two-injection superstimulation protocol would result in recovery of more embryos on average than a single-embryo recovery protocol. Although a traditional superovulation scheme with 6 to 8 injections of FSH would have been a better comparison, our goal was to handle the bison minimally. Eight female bison ranging in age from 5 to 11 years were used as embryo donors. For superovulation, females with a corpus luteum (CL) were given 25 mg of prostaglandin F2a (PGF, Lutalyse, Pfizer Animal Health, New York, NY, USA) IM followed by 266 mg of FSH (Folltropin V in MAP-5 diluent, i.m., Bioniche Animal Health Inc.) 12 days later (or 9 days after presumed oestrus 3 days post-PGF). Forty-eight hours after the first FSH injection, 134 mg of FSH IM and 25 mg of PGF IM were given. Two days later females were put in a pen with a bison bull for natural breeding. Seven days after assumed oestrus, embryos were recovered nonsurgically. Although the situation is not clear in bison, there is evidence in cattle that superovulated cycles influence embryo collections in subsequent cycles. Consequently, females were randomly assigned to a superovulation or single-embryo recovery treatment for each cycle; however, consecutive superovulation protocols were never conducted without a short oestrous cycle in between. Superovulated females were given PGF at embryo recovery after superovulation, followed by PGF 12 to 14 days later, and bred off the assumed oestrus of the second PGF injection. Embryos were collected from females 4 times (2 superovulation and 2 single embryo cycles, except one bison that was superovulated once). Data were analysed using a one-tailed t-test. Superovulation resulted in greater mean numbers of palpable CL (3.7; P < 0.001), embryos collected (1.8; P < 0.05), and transferable quality embryos (0.8; P < 0.05) compared with the single-embryo recovery protocol (mean palpable CL, 1.0; embryos collected, 0.5; transferable embryos, 0.2). Notably, the bison breeding season is July to September and occasionally animals breed in October; this experiment was conducted in October and November. Thirteen transferable embryos were nonsurgically transferred to recipients; 6 pregnancies were established, but 5 were resorbing by 2 months of gestation; 1 healthy calf was carried to term. Two injections of FSH with a long-acting diluent can be used to increase the number of embryos recovered from bison compared with a single-embryo recovery scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207