MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068104344 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2012.2224364

Fast Simulation of Microwave Circuits With Nonlinear Terminations Using High-Order Stable Methods

2012· article· en· W2068104344 on OpenAlexaff
Mina Farhan, Emad Gad, M. Nakhla, Ramachandra Achar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectronic circuitNonlinear systemMicrostripComputer scienceElectronic engineeringModel order reductionMicrowave engineeringEquivalent circuitMicrowaveNode (physics)Linear circuitTopology (electrical circuits)AlgorithmEngineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsVoltagePhysicsProjection (relational algebra)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a new method for transient simulation, using high-order stable methods, of microwave structures modeled using a large number of lumped components. The target of the proposed technique is circuit-based simulation of the large linear circuits that arise from full-wave modeling of distributed structures, such as transmission lines and microstrip elements, along with the terminating nonlinear devices. In this case, the cost of the solution of the linear system typically dominates the computational effort. The proposed method takes advantage of the special structure of the block matrices in these applications to reduce the computational cost significantly. The core of the proposed algorithm is based on the idea of “node tearing” to separate the large linear sub-circuits from the nonlinear devices. This idea faciliates handling the linear sub-circuits using a better matrix factorization technique, resulting in faster simulations compared to classical techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207