MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068108283 · doi:10.1021/es050135a

On the Relationship between <i>D</i><sub>o</sub><sub>w</sub> and <i>K</i><sub>ow</sub> in Natural Waters

2005· article· en· W2068108283 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Andrew Turner, Ian Williamson

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality and Pollution Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsPartition coefficientOctanolChemistryAqueous solutionPartition (number theory)MetalGenetic algorithmChromatographyEcologyMathematicsOrganic chemistryCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relationship between the overall octanol-water partition coefficient of a mixture of related chemical species, D(ow), and the octanol-water partition coefficients of its components, (K(ow))i, is explored. One form of the relationship (model 1) is generally applicable but relies on definition of aqueous phase speciation at equilibrium with octanol. An alternative form of the relationship (model 2) circumvents this requirement but assumes that related species are conserved during the partitioning process and is explicitly dependent on the water to octanol volume ratio, Vw/Vo. The potential applications and limitations of each model for defining the hydrophobic characteristics of chemical species in natural waters are examined in the light of experimental partition results for dissolved Cu and Pb in river waters. Given the general difficulties in accurate speciation modeling of trace metals in natural samples, model 1 was only able to estimate a K(ow) (typically in the range 0.03-0.3) for a computed organically complexed fraction of metal (generally > 90%). However, by conducting partition "isotherms" as a function of Vw/Vo and, because of the buffering capacity of natural waters, by treating a sample as two distinct hydrophilic and hydrophobic "pools", model 2 was able to estimate both the abundance and K(ow) of a more specific group of species. Parameter values derived from the latter approach indicated that river waters comprise a relatively small pool (about 4-20%) of metal whose octanol-water partitioning is in the region of 15-150. Given that the free ion activity of strongly binding metals in natural waters is extremely small, the hydrophobic fraction may, in many cases, representthe most biologically and environmentally significant component of metal. Accordingly, the experimental and modeling approaches described herein could be of great significance to an improved understanding of the fate and impacts of trace metals in the aquatic environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicWater Quality and Pollution AssessmentFrench-language works237,207