Hydrophilic Polymeric Acylphospine Oxide Photoinitiators/Crosslinkers for in Vivo Blue-Light Photopolymerization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three vinyl-functionalized phosphine oxide photoinitiating monomers have been synthesized: 4-vinylbenzoyldiphenylphosphine oxide (VBPO), 2,6-dimethyl-4-vinylbenzoyldiphenylphosphine oxide (DMVBPO), and 2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphenyl-4-vinylphenylphosphine oxide (TMBVPO). VBPO was copolymerized with vinylpyrrolidone or vinyl acetate (PPI-1a) and dimethylacrylamide (PPI-1b). DMVBPO and TMBVPO were both copolymerized with dimethylacrylamide (PPI-2 and PPI-3, respectively). The choice of vinylphosphine oxide and comonomer(s) had a significant influence on the properties of the resulting PPI. PPI-1a was not stable in solution in 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), whereas the VBPO-dimethylacrylamide (DMA) copolymer (PPI-1b) was stable in HEMA but not stable in aqueous solutions. PPI-2 was both soluble and stable in water up to 22 months. PPI-1a was as effective as trimethylbenzoyldiphenylphosphine oxide (TPO, BASF Lucirin). PPI-2 was more effective in the polymerization of HEMA/water mixtures than PPI-3. PPI-2 and PPI-3 acted as self-cross-linking species, resulting in the formation of hydrogels; PPI 3 was more effective in this. PPI-2 was very effective in forming hydrogels based on poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".