MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068120701 · doi:10.1071/mf12288

Homing in the New Zealand eagle ray, Myliobatis tenuicaudatus

2013· article· en· W2068120701 on OpenAlexaff
Megan M. Marcotte

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine and Freshwater Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIchthyology and Marine Biology
Canadian institutionsKwantlen Polytechnic University
FundersUniversity of Auckland
KeywordsHoming (biology)EstuaryBiologyCaptivityEaglePredationFisheryZoologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Homing after experimental displacement is widespread among bony fishes but has only been documented in two species of elasmobranchs, lemon sharks, Negaprion brevirostris, and Port Jackson sharks, Heterodontus portusjacksoni. To test if a species of batoid was capable of homing, New Zealand eagle rays, Myliobatis tenuicaudatus, were experimentally displaced 1.3–9.4 km from the Whangateau Estuary, where they feed, rest and are protected from predators. Significantly more rays returned to the estuary than expected by chance (seven out of eleven rays). The present study demonstrated for the first time that rays are capable of homing after experimental displacement. Homing success was not predicted by day or night capture, displacement distance, ray size, water depth at the displacement site or time in captivity. The homing rates and speeds of the rays were lower than those recorded for sharks, possibly due to a disparity in motivation and behavioural differences. Analysis of active tracks for associations with potential navigational stimuli may indicate which stimuli the rays use to home.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine and Freshwater ResearchSame topicIchthyology and Marine BiologyFrench-language works237,207