MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068127415 · doi:10.1115/omae2007-29556

Probabilistic Fatigue Reliability of Large Diameter Steel Catenary Risers (SCR) for Ultra-Deepwater Operations

2007· article· en· W2068127415 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsMartec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatenarySparReliability (semiconductor)Structural engineeringProbabilistic logicReliability engineeringEngineeringRandom variableMarine engineeringComputer scienceStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For deepwater development in the Gulf of Mexico, steel catenary risers (SCRs) supported from both SPAR and semi-submersible platforms have proven to be successful solutions for in-field flowlines, tie-backs, and export systems. It is envisaged that this will continue to be a promising solution in ultra deep-water applications, up to and beyond 10,000 ft. The study, commissioned by the Mineral Management Service (MMS), investigated the reliability of large-diameter SCRs in ultra-deepwater operations. The primary damage mode considered is fatigue failure. A probabilistic methodology for fatigue reliability is developed, which utilizes deterministic cumulative fatigue damage indicators, namely the stress levels and cycles associated with the various sea states and the fatigue strength of the members. Uncertainties in structural load and material properties are accounted for by assigning probability distributions and standard deviations to the deterministic stress levels. Furthermore, fatigue strength parameters, Miner’s indices, and capacities are modeled as random variables. First order reliability method (FORM) is employed for estimating fatigue reliability. The methodology is applied to three deterministic case studies presented by Intec Engineering (2006a, 2006b). The case studies involved either a SPAR or a semi-submersible platform. For the sake of brevity, a case study involving only a SPAR platform is presented in this paper. The effect of uncertainties in parameters on fatigue reliabilities is investigated. It is observed that the fatigue reliability estimates followed similar trends as the deterministic cumulative damage results, and hence can be used to complement deterministic estimates. Additional benefit and insight gained from the probabilistic study, which can be used for design decisions, include information regarding probabilistic importance and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. For case study presented here, it is seen that in general, uncertainty in the fatigue strength exponent (m) has the highest impact on fatigue reliability of SCRs. The second most important random variable is the stress range (S), which captures uncertainties in parameters such as loads and material properties. Parametric sensitivity studies on the fatigue strength parameters indicate that SCR reliability is sensitive to both the standard deviation and probability distribution of the parameters, thus highlighting the need for accurate probabilistic calibration of the random variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207