MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Trends in Postpartum Hemorrhage in High Resource Countries: A Review and Recommendations From the International Postpartum Hemorrhage Collaborative Group

2010· review· en· W2068236089 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marian Knight, William M. Callaghan, Cynthia J. Berg, Sophie Alexander, Marie‐Hélène Bouvier‐Colle, Jane B. Ford, K.S. Joseph, Gwyneth Lewis, Robert M. Liston, Christine L. Roberts, Jeremy Oats, James J. Walker

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and fetal healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)Placenta accretaObstetricsPregnancyPlacentaFetus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is considerable evidence for increasing trends in the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) over time. The aim of the present study was to investigate trends in the frequency and the severity of PPH in developed countries, and to assess potential causes for any observed trends. There was an increasing trend in PPH in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The increased incidence of PPH was limited solely to immediate/atonic PPH in Australia, Canada, and the United States. Increasing rates of severe adverse outcomes due to PPH were found in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The key recommendations of the Collaborative Group are as follows: in future revisions of the International Classification of Diseases, there should be separate codes for atonic PPH and other forms of PPH that occur in the first 24 hours after delivery of the placenta. Separate codes are also required for morbidly adherent placenta including placenta accreta, increta, and percreta. A standardized definition of PPH should be used in all countries. Research is needed to determine how current definitions are applied in practice to the coding of data. Improved methods of data collection are required including assessment of severity. Additional studies are required to determine whether increases in rate of PPH have occurred in other countries, and to evaluate the role of potential risk factors of PPH including obesity, increased duration of labor, and changes in management of the second and third stage. A key to reducing the severity of PPH and preventing adverse outcomes is enhanced training of maternity care staff in the assessment of blood loss and the monitoring of women following childbirth. Physicians should be more aware of the likelihood that the frequency and severity of PPH has increased and be more vigilant. The reported increased incidence of PPH is especially a problem in small hospitals with few deliveries. Such hospitals have limited access to equipment or drugs and lack adequate management protocols to treat women with unexpected severe PPH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrical & Gynecological SurveySame topicMaternal and fetal healthcareFrench-language works237,207