MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068269195 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2012.2197643

A Wavelet/PSO Based Voltage Regulation Scheme and Suitability Analysis of Copper- and Aluminum-Rotor Induction Machines for Distributed Wind Power Generation

2012· article· en· W2068269195 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaomin Lu, K. Lakshmi Varaha Iyer, Kaushik Mukherjee, Narayan C. Kar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEngineeringRotor (electric)Induction generatorParticle swarm optimizationController (irrigation)Control engineeringInduction motorElectricity generationControl theory (sociology)Automatic Generation ControlVoltageElectric power systemElectronic engineeringComputer sciencePower (physics)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Centralized generation is being supplemented or replaced fast by distributed generation, a new way of thinking about electricity generation, transmission and distribution. Understanding the significance and prospects of self-excited induction generators (SEIGs) in distributed wind power generation (DWPG), this paper firstly presents a comprehensive suitability analysis of commercially available niche copper-rotor induction motor (CRIM) and conventional aluminum-rotor induction motor (ARIM) to be used as induction generators in the above application, through experimental investigations performed on two industrial 7.5 hp CRIM and ARIM. The results of the performance analyses on the two machines provide data for development of a novel control scheme comprising of wavelet transforms and particle swarm optimization technique, proposed next, to alleviate the problem of voltage regulation (VR) associated with the SEIGs. The developed controller for VR is implemented on a low cost embedded system, hence making it economical and flexible for patenting. The developed embedded system is validated initially through an actuator performing mechanical switching of requisite capacitances and finally by integrating it with another actuator, namely, the static synchronous compensator (STATCOM), for efficient voltage regulation. Finally, the tested results are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score0.649

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Smart GridSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207