MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068312891 · doi:10.1115/fpmc2013-4498

Fault Detection of an Electrohydrostatic Actuator With the SVSF Time-Varying Boundary Layer Concept

2013· article· en· W2068312891 on OpenAlexaff
S. Andrew Gadsden, Saeid Habibi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)ActuatorKalman filterSmoothingComputer scienceMetric (unit)Fault detection and isolationNoise (video)Filter (signal processing)Boundary (topology)EngineeringMathematicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electrohydrostatic actuator (EHA) is an efficient type of actuator commonly used in aerospace applications. It makes use of a closed hydraulic circuit, a number of control valves, an electric motor, and a fluid pump (usually a type of gear pump). The smooth variable structure filter (SVSF) is a relatively new estimation strategy based on sliding mode concepts formulated in a predictor-corrector fashion. The SVSF offers a number of advantages over other traditional estimation methods, including robust and stable estimates, and an additional performance metric. A fixed smoothing boundary layer was implemented in an effort to ensure stable estimates, and is defined based on the amount of uncertainties and noise present in the estimation process. Recent advances in SVSF theory include a time-varying smoothing boundary layer. This method, known as the SVSF-VBL, offers an optimal formulation of the SVSF as well as a method for detecting changes or faults in a system. This paper implements the SVSF-VBL in an effort to detect faults in an EHA. The results are compared with traditional Kalman filter-based methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207