MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068327846 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.052007

Search for new phenomena in the dijet mass distribution using<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math>collision data at<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>8</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>TeV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>with the ATLAS detector

2015· article· lv· W2068327846 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2015
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceAustralian Research CouncilNational Research Council CanadaServices Fédéraux des Affaires Scientifiques, Techniques et CulturellesState Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOMBundesministerium für Wissenschaft und ForschungGeorgian National Science FoundationEuropean Research CouncilMax-Planck-GesellschaftCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCanada Foundation for InnovationMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoNarodowe Centrum NaukiKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseMinistarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog RazvojaLundbeckfondenMinistry of Education and Science of the Russian FederationBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftAustrian Science FundScience and Technology Facilities CouncilSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungMinisterstvo Průmyslu a ObchoduDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekChinese Academy of SciencesNational Science CouncilVetenskapsrådetIsraeli Centers for Research ExcellenceU.S. Department of EnergyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaLeverhulme TrustEuropean CommissionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaTürkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchDepartment of Science and Technology, Republic of South AfricaNational Science FoundationNorges ForskningsrådAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungTRIUMFCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueRoyal SocietyMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovyH. Lundbeck A/SDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaStichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der MaterieDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)CERNMinisterstvo školstva, vedy, výskumu a športu Slovenskej republikyDanmarks GrundforskningsfondIsrael Science FoundationHelmholtz-GemeinschaftGeneral Secretariat for Research and Technology
KeywordsDistribution (mathematics)Computer sciencePhysicsComputer graphics (images)MathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dijet events produced in LHC proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy $\sqrt{s}=8\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{TeV}$ are studied with the ATLAS detector using the full 2012 data set, with an integrated luminosity of $20.3\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{fb}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$. Dijet masses up to about 4.5 TeV are probed. No resonancelike features are observed in the dijet mass spectrum. Limits on the cross section times acceptance are set at the 95% credibility level for various hypotheses of new phenomena in terms of mass or energy scale, as appropriate. This analysis excludes excited quarks with a mass below 4.06 TeV, color-octet scalars with a mass below 2.70 TeV, heavy ${W}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ bosons with a mass below 2.45 TeV, chiral ${W}^{*}$ bosons with a mass below 1.75 TeV, and quantum black holes with six extra space-time dimensions with threshold mass below 5.66 TeV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it