Peptide Leukotriene Involvement in Pulmonary Eosinophil Migration upon Antigen Challenge in the Actively Sensitized Guinea Pig
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Male Dunkin Hartley guinea pigs, actively sensitized to ovalbumin (OA) and pretreated with mepyramine (1 mg/kg i.p.), were challenged with OA as an aerosol. Histological analysis of the lung for eosinophils (EOs) showed significant accumulations in the submucosa of the airways (8 h: 1.477.3 +/- 43 EOs/mm2 airway, n = 3, p less than 0.01), after antigen challenge compared to saline control (478.6 +/- 104 EOs/mm2 airway, n = 4). Pretreatment with both mepyramine and cimetidine (10 mg/kg i.p.) did not affect this response. Aerosolization of OA to unsensitized guinea pigs resulted in no significant accumulation of EOs (360.2 +/- 49 EOs/mm2 airway, n = 4) when compared with the saline-challenged sensitized control group. Pretreatment with the leukotriene (LT)D4 receptor antagonist MK-571 (1 mg/kg p.o.) significantly inhibited the OA-induced EO migration (95 +/- 5% inhibition, n = 5, p less than 0.01) compared to vehicle in the presence of mepyramine and cimetidine, while indomethacin (3 mg/kg p.o., n = 4) had no effect. Aerosolization of synthetic LTC4 (0.3-30 micrograms/ml) resulted in a dose-dependent migration of EOs into the submucosal layer over 8 h, reaching significance at the 10-micrograms/ml dose, with comparable results obtained with LTD4. Pretreatment of animals with MK-571 (1 mg/kg p.o.) before LTC4 and LTD4 aerosol results in inhibition of the response in both cases, suggesting that this effect may be mediated through the LTD4 receptor. We conclude that peptide LTs produce eosinophilia in the airways of the guinea pig.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".