PACAP Acts as a Neurotrophic Factor During Histogenesis of the Rat Cerebellar Cortex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During development of the rat cerebellum, PAC1 receptors are transiently expressed by neuroblasts of the external granule cell layer (EGL). We have previously shown that PACAP is a potent stimulator of granule cell survival in vitro. In the study reported in this paper, we have investigated the effect of PACAP on the development of the rat cerebellar cortex in vivo. PACAP induces a transient increase in the volume of the cerebellar cortex, with a maximum effect at postnatal day 12, which can be accounted for by an increase in the number of granule cells in the EGL, the molecular layer, and the internal granule cell layer (IGL). The effect of PACAP on the number of granule cells is blocked by the antagonist PACAP(6-38), which, by itself, produces a slight inhibition of the number of granule cells in the IGL. These data indicate that PACAP activates proliferation and/or inhibits programmed cell death of granule cells in the developing rat cerebellum. PACAP also stimulates neuronal migration from the EGL to the IGL. Thus, it appears that PACAP can act in vivo as a neurotrophic factor controlling histogenesis of the cerebellar cortex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".