Catalytic Residues and an Electrostatic Sandwich That Promote Enolpyruvyl Shikimate 3-Phosphate Synthase (AroA) Catalysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase (EPSP synthase, AroA) catalyzes the sixth step in aromatic amino acid biosynthesis. It forms EPSP from shikimate 3-phosphate (S3P) and phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) in an addition/elimination reaction that proceeds through a tetrahedral intermediate. In spite of numerous mechanistic studies, the catalytic roles of specific amino acid residues remain an open question. Recent experimental evidence for cationic intermediates or cationic transition states, and a consideration of the catalytic imperative, have guided this study on the catalytic roles of Lys22 (K22), Asp313 (D313), and Glu341 (E341). Steady-state and pre-steady-state kinetics and protein stability studies showed that mutations of D313 and E341 caused k(cat) to decrease up to 30,000-fold and 76,000-fold, respectively, while the effects on K(M) were modest, never more than 40-fold. Thus, both are identified as catalytic residues. In an active site that is overwhelmingly positively charged, the D313 and E341 side chains are positioned to form an "electrostatic sandwich" around the positive charge at C2 in cationic intermediates/transition states, stabilizing them and thereby promoting catalysis. Mutation of K22 showed large effects on K(M,S3P) (100-fold), K(M,PEP) (>760-fold), and up to 120-fold on k(cat). Thus, K22 had roles in both substrate-binding and transition-state stabilization. These results support the identification of E341 and K22 as general acid/base catalytic residues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".