Premature death in adults with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is a multisystem disease with a prevalence of 1/4000. Variable expression of congenital and later onset features contributes to its under-recognition. Longevity in those surviving childhood is believed to be normal but data are limited. METHODS: We prospectively followed 264 subjects; 102 adults (>17 years) with 22q11.2DS (44 male (M), 58 female (F); mean (SD) age 33.6 (10.9) years) and their 162 unaffected siblings (77 M, 85 F; mean age 36.1 (12.2) years). We compared survival between groups using Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS: Twelve (11.8%; 4 M, 8 F) individuals with 22q11.2DS and no siblings died (p<0.0001). Survival to ages 40 and 50 years was 89.9% and 73.9%, respectively. Median age at death was 41.5 (range 18.1-68.6) years. Deaths included two (7.7%) of 26 subjects with neither major congenital heart disease (CHD) nor schizophrenia. Four of six sudden and unexpected deaths occurred in individuals with no major CHD. There was no evidence of cancer or coronary artery disease or family history of sudden death in the 12 patients who died, six of whom had autopsies. DISCUSSION: Individuals with 22q11.2DS who survive childhood have diminished life expectancy and increased risk of sudden death not attributable to any single factor. Some sudden and/or premature deaths observed in the general population may represent undiagnosed 22q11.2DS. Increased recognition of the syndrome by family doctors, specialists and coroners will be essential to facilitate the tissue studies needed to determine underlying mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".