MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068430448 · doi:10.1517/13543770802672598

Recent advances in the development of NS5B polymerase inhibitors for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection

2009· review· en· W2068430448 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre L. Beaulieu

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsBoehringer Ingelheim (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHepatitis C virusMedicineCirrhosisDiseaseVirusLiver diseaseHepatitis CImmunologyIntensive care medicineVirologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: 170 to 200 million people worldwide are believed to suffer from chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, a blood-born disease that targets the liver and progresses to organ cirrhosis and primary cancer in a significant proportion of patients. The currently available treatment has limited efficacy and suffers from restricting side effects. HCV infection is the principal cause of liver transplant in industrialized nations and between 8000 and 10,000 deaths result annually from the disease in the United States alone. Virus-specific, more efficacious, and better-tolerated anti-HCV therapies are thus required to address the unmet medical need. OBJECTIVE: To review progress achieved since 2005 in the development of HCV NS5B polymerase inhibitors as potential therapy for the treatment of HCV infection with a primary focus on available patent and medical literature. RESULTS/CONCLUSION: Several classes of small-molecule inhibitors of HCV NS5B have progressed into clinical development and demonstrated efficacy in reducing viral load in infected patients. The results so far provide an encouraging foundation for the development of novel, more tolerable therapies and addressing emergence of resistance through combination of antiviral agents with complementary mechanisms of action.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations100
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Therapeutic PatentsSame topicHepatitis C virus researchFrench-language works237,207