Satiric lament for a city: Mordecai Richler's <i>Oh Canada! Oh Quebec!</i> , Bill 101 and Montreal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the last decade of his life, Mordecai Richler found some of his favouritesatirical targets – cultural nationalism, special pleading, injustice andanti-Semitism – fused in the province of Quebec's aspiration for nationhood,especially as that ambition was expressed in 1977's Bill 101, theCharter of the French Language, and its many refinements. This law drasticallyrestricted the use of English in Quebec, violating in outrageousfashion, in Richler's view, the democratic right to free expression ofQuebec's non-Francophone minorities. Richler first gained notorietyamong the Québécois when he published his criticisms in an article forthe New Yorker (1991), which became the book Oh Canada! Oh Quebec!Requiem for a Divided Country (1992). The present article first contextualisesRichler's satire in the history of Canadian satire, then briefly inRichler's relation to Montreal, and finally in Quebec history with particularreference to language. It proceeds to offer an explication andanalysis of Richler's satirical criticisms of Quebec's nationalism andlanguage laws, and, in closing, shows more extensively that embeddedin Richler's satirical analysis is a hitherto overlooked prose elegy for hisbeloved native city of Montreal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".