MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068564096 · doi:10.1080/17453670610013358

Misconceptions about practicing evidence-based orthopedic surgery

2007· article· en· W2068564096 on OpenAlexaff
Rudolf W. Poolman, Brad Petrisor, René K. Marti, Gin M Kerkhoffs, Michael Zlowodzki, Mohit Bhandari

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Orthopaedica · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip and Femur Fractures
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthopedic surgeryMedicineSurgeryEvidence-based medicineMEDLINEOrthopedic ProceduresGeneral surgeryAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since its inception in the early 1990s, evidencebased medicine (EBM) has been gaining recognition in the literature of both general and orthopedic surgery (Sauerland et al. 1999, Hurwitz et al. 200...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.065
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.233
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score0.346

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0650.233
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.014
Scholarly communication0.0050.011
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0080.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa OrthopaedicaSame topicHip and Femur FracturesFrench-language works237,207