MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068575863 · doi:10.1002/pbc.23090

Twenty‐five year follow‐up of childhood Wilms tumor: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

2011· article· en· W2068575863 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Blood & Cancer · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioCumulative incidenceIncidence (geometry)CohortPediatricsConfidence intervalWilms' tumorSiblingCohort studyPopulationInternal medicineCancerEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Treatment cures over 90% of children with Wilms tumor (WT) who subsequently risk late morbidity and mortality. This study describes the 25-year outcomes of 5-year WT survivors in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS). PROCEDURE: The CCSS, a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study, assessed WT survivors (N = 1,256), diagnosed 1970-1986, for chronic health conditions, health status, health care utilization, socioeconomic status, subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs), and mortality compared to the US population and a sibling cohort (N = 4,023). RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of all and severe chronic health conditions was 65.4% and 24.2% at 25 years. Hazard ratios (HR) were 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-2.3 for grades 1-4 and 4.7, 95%CI 3.6-6.1 for grades 3 and 4, compared to sibling group. WT survivors reported more adverse general health status than the sibling group (prevalence ratio [PR] 1.7; 95%CI 1.2-2.4), but mental health status, socioeconomic outcome, and health care utilization were similar. The cumulative incidence of SMN was 3.0% (95%CI 1.9-4.0%) and of mortality was 6.1% (95%CI 4.7-7.4%). Radiation exposure increased the likelihood of congestive heart failure (CHF) (no doxorubicin-HR 6.6; 95%CI 1.6-28.3; doxorubicin ≤ 250 mg/m(2) -HR 13.0; 95%CI 1.9-89.7; doxorubicin >250 mg/m(2) -HR 18.3; 95%CI 3.8-88.2), SMN (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] 9.0; 95%CI 3.9-17.7 with and 4.9; 95%CI 1.8-10.6 without doxorubicin) and death. CONCLUSION: Long-term survivors of WT treated from 1970 to 1986 are at increased risk of treatment related morbidity and mortality 25 years from diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it