Evolution of glutamine synthetase in vertebrates: multiple glutamine synthetase genes expressed in rainbow trout (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss)</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glutamine synthetase (GSase) is a key enzyme in nitrogen metabolism and encoded by a single gene in mammals. Using PCR cloning techniques, including RT-PCR from total RNA and PCR from a cDNA library, we find evidence of four expressed GSase mRNAs for the tetraploid rainbow trout. For two of these mRNAs (Onmy-GS01, -GS02) we characterize the full-length coding regions, and for two others (Onmy-GS03, -GS04), we describe partial sequences. Northern analysis of Onmy-GS01, -GS02, -GS03 and -GS04 indicates that (1) Onmy-GS02 is expressed at higher levels relative to the other transcripts in most adult tissues, with the exception of brain and gill, where Onmy-GS01 is at the highest level, and (2) the tissue with the highest level of expression of all four transcripts is the brain, with decreasing levels in the intestine, liver, red muscle, gill/kidney, white muscle and heart. Clearly, rainbow trout possess multiple GSase genes with differing levels of tissue expression, implying manifold potential routes of regulation for this octameric enzyme. Our data also indicate that caution should be taken when interpreting mRNA expression data of a single gene, unless multiple genes have been ruled out. Consistent with a southern blot, phylogenetic and intron sequence analyses imply that the trout genes are encoded by at least four separate loci, belonging to two distinct evolutionary branches. Our data on rainbow trout, together with those from two full-length zebrafish Danio rerio GSase genes compiled from GenBank ESTs, support the idea that fish GSases are polyphyletic and that gene duplications have occurred at multiple points and in independent lineages throughout the evolution of bony fishes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".