MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068626386 · doi:10.1109/twc.2010.03.061099

PAPR reduction of OFDM using PTS and error-correcting code subblocking - Transactions Papers

2010· article· en· W2068626386 on OpenAlexaff
A. Ghassemi, T. Aaron Gulliver

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingFast Fourier transformReduction (mathematics)AlgorithmComputational complexity theoryComputer scienceAutocorrelationMathematicsCode (set theory)Distortion (music)Channel (broadcasting)ArithmeticTelecommunicationsStatisticsBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Partial transmit sequence (PTS) is a proven technique to reduce the peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) in orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) systems. It achieves considerable PAPR reduction without distortion, but the high computational complexity of multiple Fourier transforms is a problem in practical systems. To address the complexity, signals at the middle stages of an ¿-point radix FFT using decimation in frequency (DIF) are employed for PTS subblocking. We formulate OFDM symbols based on these signals to exploit the periodic autocorrelation function (ACF) of the vectors in the PTS subblock partitioning. Error-correcting codes (ECCs) are employed in the subblocking for the PTS radix FFT. This new technique significantly decreases the computational complexity while providing comparable PAPR reduction to ordinary PTS (O-PTS), even with a small number of stages after PTS partitioning. Numerical results are presented which confirm the PAPR improvements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207