Diagenetic fluorapatite and aluminum phosphatesulphate in the Paleoproterozoic Thelon Formation and Hornby Bay Group, northwestern Canadian Shield
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the northwestern part of the Canadian Shield, fluorapatite and a rare-earth element-bearing hydrated aluminum phosphatesulphate mineral (APS) occur as cements in continental successions near the base of the Paleoproterozoic Thelon Formation (Thelon Basin) and Hornby Bay Group (Hornby Bay Basin). These minerals occupy interstitial sites, form euhedral crystals, display micro-scale zonation, make up part of an unmetamorphosed paragenetic assemblage, and are distributed in correlative units across thousands of square kilometres, suggesting a diagenetic origin. Stratigraphy, geochronology, and other lines of evidence suggest that the Thelon Formation and Hornby Bay Group containing these phosphatic cements, as well as the Ellice Formation and Athabasca Group, are correlative and may have been originally interconnected. The evidence suggests that the basal Thelon Formation and the Hornby Bay Group underwent similar, and approximately coeval, diagenetic mineral paragenesis. Furthermore, the diagenetic fluids in these different locations must have been remarkably similar, especially those that produced the delicate APS mineral. Compared to phosphatic cements in the Hornby Bay and Thelon basins, unmineralized sandstone in the Athabasca Basin contains "crandallite group" and fluorapatite cements higher in the basin fill sequence (Wolverine Point Formation) in tuffaceous sandstone and as relatively early cement in the paragenetic sequence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".