MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068677550 · doi:10.1139/e06-011

Diagenetic fluorapatite and aluminum phosphatesulphate in the Paleoproterozoic Thelon Formation and Hornby Bay Group, northwestern Canadian Shield

2006· article· en· W2068677550 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Q Gall, J A Donaldson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityStatistics Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyDiagenesisGeochemistryBayParagenesisFluorapatiteGeochronologyPaleontologyMetamorphic rockOceanographyApatite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the northwestern part of the Canadian Shield, fluorapatite and a rare-earth element-bearing hydrated aluminum phosphate–sulphate mineral (APS) occur as cements in continental successions near the base of the Paleoproterozoic Thelon Formation (Thelon Basin) and Hornby Bay Group (Hornby Bay Basin). These minerals occupy interstitial sites, form euhedral crystals, display micro-scale zonation, make up part of an unmetamorphosed paragenetic assemblage, and are distributed in correlative units across thousands of square kilometres, suggesting a diagenetic origin. Stratigraphy, geochronology, and other lines of evidence suggest that the Thelon Formation and Hornby Bay Group containing these phosphatic cements, as well as the Ellice Formation and Athabasca Group, are correlative and may have been originally interconnected. The evidence suggests that the basal Thelon Formation and the Hornby Bay Group underwent similar, and approximately coeval, diagenetic mineral paragenesis. Furthermore, the diagenetic fluids in these different locations must have been remarkably similar, especially those that produced the delicate APS mineral. Compared to phosphatic cements in the Hornby Bay and Thelon basins, unmineralized sandstone in the Athabasca Basin contains "crandallite group" and fluorapatite cements higher in the basin fill sequence (Wolverine Point Formation) in tuffaceous sandstone and as relatively early cement in the paragenetic sequence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207