MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Determining the Earliest Time Within 30 Minutes to Erectogenic Effect After Tadalafil 10 and 20 mg: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, At-Home Study

2004· article· en· W2068683011 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Raymond C. Rosen, Harin Padma-Nathan, Ridwan Shabsigh, Khalil G. Saikali, V. Watkins, William E. Pullman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEli Lilly CanadaEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsTadalafilPlaceboDouble blindMulticenter studyMedicineAnesthesiaRandomized controlled trialSurgeryErectile dysfunctionAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). The minimal time to onset of erectogenic effect in the at-home setting has not been evaluated. AIM: The goal was to determine the earliest time to erectogenic effect leading to successful intercourse within 30 minutes after taking tadalafil 10 and 20 mg. METHODS: The multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase-2 study enrolled men at least 21 years old with a minimum 3-month history of ED. Four single doses each of placebo, tadalafil 10 mg, or 20 mg were taken at home once every 8-10 days. Using a stopwatch, couples recorded in Sexual Encounter Profile diaries the earliest time within 30 minutes after dosing to the first erection adequate for vaginal penetration, and whether the erection led to successful intercourse. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary analysis compared the percentage of erections resulting in successful intercourse between tadalafil groups and placebo at one-minute intervals using a step-down procedure. A secondary analysis compared the overall distribution of time to erectogenic effect between treatment groups using the Cox Regression Method. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, a significant erectogenic response to tadalafil 20 mg was found from 30 minutes down to 16 minutes after dosing (P = 0.012). Response to tadalafil 10 mg approached significance (P = 0.054) at 30 minutes. As analysed by the Cox Regression Method, a significant erectogenic response was found from 30 minutes down to 15 minutes after dosing for tadalafil 20 mg (P = 0.020), and from 30 minutes down to 26 minutes for tadalafil 10 mg (P = 0.042). Fifty-two percent of men taking tadalafil 20 mg had at least one successful intercourse attempt within 30 minutes compared to 35.1% of men taking placebo (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: This stopwatch-based study demonstrated a pharmacodynamic effect within 30 minutes after dosing for tadalafil 10 and 20 mg.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Randomized triallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Randomized trialhigh
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Sexual MedicineSame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207