MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

INDUCTION OF HUMAN HISTO-BLOOD GROUP A ANTIGEN EXPRESSION IN MOUSE CELLS BY GENE THERAPY USING LENTIVIRAL VECTORS HARBORING HUMAN ABH-RELATED GLYCOSYLTRANSFERASE GENES

2004· article· en· W2068731332 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaolian Fan, A. Ang, K. Tao, Lori J. West

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiochemical and Molecular Research
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick ChildrenHeart and Stroke FoundationCanadian Institutes of Health Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMolecular biologyViral vectorAntigenTransfectionCell cultureVirologyGenetic enhancementPlasmidGeneRecombinant DNAImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

P966 Aims: We recently discovered that ABO-incompatibility is not a barrier in infant heart transplantation and that infant recipients of ABO-incompatible hearts develop B cell tolerance to specific donor-type ABH antigens. We hypothesize that induction of cell surface human histo-blood group A antigen expression in neonatal mice will induce specific B cell tolerance, allowing us to generate a murine model for mechanistic investigation. This study determined the feasibility of inducing human A antigen expression in murine cells, both in vitro and in vivo, using replication-deficient lentiviral vectors capable of stable long-term integration into the cellular genome. Methods: The human α-1,2-fucosyltransferase (FUT1; for H antigen expression) gene was cloned into a lentiviral vector, and the human A glycosyltransferase (A-trs; for A antigen expression) gene was cloned into a bicistronic lentiviral vector also containing the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene. Infection-competent lentiviral particles were produced by co-transfection of 293T cells with FUT1 or A-trs vector and 2 helper plasmids. Viral supernatants were concentrated for titers up to 5x109 transducing units/ml. HeLa (human cervical carcinoma cells of histo-blood group O origin), LTA (mouse fibroblast) and SVEC-10 (mouse endothelial) cells were infected with FUT1 and/or A-trs lentiviral particles. GFP and cell surface H and A antigen expression were assessed by ‘Cellular ELISA’ (CELISA) and confocal microscopy. Neonatal BALB/c mice were injected with FUT1 and A-trs lentiviral particles; GFP was detected post-injection by flow cytometry. Results: Infection with FUT1 lentiviral particles enhanced H antigen expression by HeLa cells. Expression of A antigen was moderate in HeLa cells infected with only A-trs lentiviral particles and appreciably higher with FUT1 co-infection. LTA and SVEC-10 cells infected with FUT1 particles exhibited dose-dependent H antigen expression. Expression of A antigen by LTA and SVEC-10 cells occurred only when infected with both FUT1 and A-trs, suggesting the murine homologue of FUT1 does not provide H antigen expression sufficient for A antigen synthesis. Expression of A antigen was dose-dependent; doses of H and A lentivirus for optimal A antigen expression were determined. Fluorescent imaging of H and A antigen-positive cells was consistent with CELISA data. All cells exhibiting surface A antigen also showed GFP fluorescence. FACS analysis of peripheral mononuclear cells from mice injected as neonates with FUT1 and A-trs lentiviral particles revealed GFP expression in 18% of cells, 9 days post-injection. Conclusions: Our lentiviral vectors induced H and A antigen expression by human and mouse cells. Mouse cells required induction of H antigen for cell surface expression of A antigen. GFP expression in mice 9 days after neonatal injection with FUT1 and A-trs lentiviral particles suggests in vivo induction of H and A antigen expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.677

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicBiochemical and Molecular ResearchFrench-language works237,207