Oligomerization of Ebola Virus VP40 Is Essential for Particle Morphogenesis and Regulation of Viral Transcription
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The morphogenesis and budding of virus particles represent an important stage in the life cycle of viruses. For Ebola virus, this process is driven by its major matrix protein, VP40. Like the matrix proteins of many other nonsegmented, negative-strand RNA viruses, VP40 has been demonstrated to oligomerize and to occur in at least two distinct oligomeric states: hexamers and octamers, which are composed of antiparallel dimers. While it has been shown that VP40 oligomers are essential for the viral life cycle, their function is completely unknown. Here we have identified two amino acids essential for oligomerization of VP40, the mutation of which blocked virus-like particle production. Consistent with this observation, oligomerization-deficient VP40 also showed impaired intracellular transport to budding sites and reduced binding to cellular membranes. However, other biological functions, such as the interaction of VP40 with the nucleoprotein, NP, remained undisturbed. Furthermore, both wild-type VP40 and oligomerization-deficient VP40 were found to negatively regulate viral genome replication, a novel function of VP40, which we have recently reported. Interestingly, while wild-type VP40 was also able to negatively regulate viral genome transcription, oligomerization-deficient VP40 was no longer able to fulfill this function, indicating that regulation of viral replication and transcription by VP40 are mechanistically distinct processes. These data indicate that VP40 oligomerization not only is a prerequisite for intracellular transport of VP40 and efficient membrane binding, and as a consequence virion morphogenesis, but also plays a critical role in the regulation of viral transcription by VP40.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".