Characterization by Raman Microspectroscopy of the Strain-Induced Conformational Transition in Fibroin Fibers from the Silkworm<i> Samia </i><i>c</i><i>ynthia </i><i>r</i><i>icini</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Raman microspectroscopy has been used to quantitatively study the effect of a mechanical deformation on the conformation and orientation of Samia cynthia ricini (S. c. ricini) silk fibroin. Samples were obtained from the aqueous solution stored in the silk gland and stretched at draw ratios (lambda) ranging from 0 to 11. Using an appropriate band decomposition procedure, polarized and orientation-insensitive spectra have been analyzed to determine order parameters and the content of secondary structures, respectively. The data unambiguously show that, in response to mechanical deformation, S. c. ricini fibroin undergoes a cooperative alpha-helix to beta-sheet conformational transition above a critical draw ratio of 4. The alpha-helix content decreases from 33 to 13% when lambda increases from 0 to 11, while the amount of beta-sheets increases from 15 to 37%. In comparison, cocoon silk is devoid of alpha-helical structure and always contains a larger amount of beta-sheets. Although the presence of isosbestic points in different spectral regions reveals that the conformational change induced by mechanical deformation is a two-state process, our results suggest that part of the glycine residues might be incorporated into beta-poly(alanine) structures. The beta-sheets are initially isotropically distributed and orient along the fiber axis as lambda increases, but do not reach the high level of orientation found in the cocoon fiber. The increase in the orientation level of the beta-sheets is found to be concomitant with the alpha --> beta conformational conversion, whereas alpha-helices do not orient under the applied strain but are rather readily converted into beta-sheets. The components assigned to turns exhibit a small orientation perpendicular to the fiber axis in stretched samples, showing that, overall, the polypeptide chains are aligned along the stretching direction. Our results suggest that, in nature, factors other than stretching contribute to the optimization of the amount of beta-sheets and the high degree of orientation found in natural cocoon silk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".