Sustained Cardioprotection Afforded by A2A Adenosine Receptor Stimulation After 72 Hours of Myocardial Reperfusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was designed to determine whether cardioprotection afforded by A2A adenosine receptor stimulation can be sustained and to determine the effect of an A2A adenosine receptor agonist on Akt and cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) activation, as well as Hsp27 and Hsp70 protein expression in such events. The left anterior descending coronary artery was occluded for 40 minutes in anesthetized rats followed by 72 hours of reperfusion. A2A agonist (CGS21680 at 0.2 microg/kg/min) was administered for 120 minutes, starting either 5 minutes before (early) or after (late) the beginning of reperfusion. Infarct size was reduced significantly in the early compared with the control group (35.2 +/- 1.9% and 52.5 +/- 3.4%, respectively; P < 0.05), whereas no difference was observed with the late group (44.5 +/- 7.1%). After 72 hours of reperfusion, drug administration was accompanied by Akt activation (early, 121.8 +/- 17.6%; late, 118.1 +/- 16.4%; P < 0.05), as well as elevated Hsp27 expression (early, 197.2 +/- 27.7%; late, 203.8 +/- 36.8%; P < 0.05); CREB activation and Hsp70 expression were not altered. In another set of experiments in which reperfusion was limited to 15 minutes, Akt was activated only in the early group (121.8 +/- 17.6%; P < 0.05). Moreover, CREB was activated in both the early and late groups (98.4 +/- 8.3% and 107.0 +/- 6.5%, respectively; P < 0.05), whereas Hsp27 and Hsp70 expression were not altered. These results demonstrate that A2A adenosine receptor activation induces a sustained cardioprotection only if the therapy is instituted before reperfusion. This myocardial protection is associated by an early prosurvival Akt activation. CREB activation and Hsp27 content do not seem to be associated with cardioprotection because they are enhanced in both treated groups, suggesting indirect A2A agonist and pathology-related effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".