Palaeoclimatic implications of Middle Jurassic (Bajocian) coniferous wood from the Neuquén Basin, west-central Argentina
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Silicified coniferous wood is commonly found in the Middle Jurassic (Bajocian) Lajas Formation of the Neuquén Basin, west-central Argentina. The wood is preserved in a succession of sandstones, siltstones, mudstones and minor conglomerates that represent deposition as part of tide-dominated deltas and fluvial plains across which large rivers meandered. Most of the wood occurs as dense accumulations in the tidal and fluvial channels. The wood fragments are worn, abraded, and lack both bark and branches, indicating that they were transported prior to deposition. The material is typically 20–30 cm long, with only infrequent examples of larger trunks ( c. 80 cm in diameter, 5–6 m long). No trunks were found with root systems attached, and no stumps were found upright and in situ . The fossil wood genus Araucarioxylon dominates the assemblage. Growth rings are largely absent from the specimens, although one sample (from Rhea Gorge) displays highly diffuse and irregularly spaced rings, suggesting that it grew in different conditions from the others studied. Large-scale interpretations for southern Gondwana suggest a seasonally dry climate. However, these fossil wood specimens show no evidence of this, indicating that in this area at least the effects of any seasonal component to the climate may have been over-ridden by factors such as a locally plentiful supply of water and/or the possibility that growth was to some extent controlled by the taxonomic affinity of the trees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".