MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068866778 · doi:10.4021/jmc.v4i10.1439

Intraductal Papillary Neoplasm of the Bile Duct Arising From a Background of Autoimmune Hepatitis: A Case Report

2013· article· en· W2068866778 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Takafumi Saito, Tomohiro Katsumi, Kyoko Tomita, Chikako Sato, Yuko Nishise, Kazuo Okumoto, Hisayoshi Watanabe, Naohiko Makino, Rintaro Ohe, Mitsunori Yamakawa, Wataru Kimura, Yoshiyuki Ueno

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Diseases and Immunity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHistopathologyAutoimmune hepatitisPathologyBile ductHepatocellular carcinomaIntrahepatic bile ductsHepatectomyHepatitisInfiltration (HVAC)NeoplasmInternal medicineGastroenterologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) is a rare cystic tumor of the liver defined separately from hepatic mucinous cystic neoplasm. Development of liver cancer in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is also sporadic, and such cases reported previously have been hepatocellular carcinoma. Here we report a 50-year-old man with IPNB complicated by AIH who underwent a successful extended left hepatectomy. Histopathology and immunohistochemical staining of the resected tumor revealed that it was a pancreatobiliary-type IPNB expressing both MUC5AC and MUC6, accompanied by carcinoma in situ expressing p53, Ki-67 and CA19-9. The histopathology of the background liver was compatible with that of AIH showing interface hepatitis with accompanying plasma cell infiltration. The patient has remained free of cancer recurrence for 12 years following the hepatectomy, and liver dysfunction caused by AIH has been controllable by steroid administration. This is the first report of pancreatobiliary-type IPNB associated with AIH. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/jmc1439w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicLiver Diseases and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207