MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068905702 · doi:10.1002/phar.1485

Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation: Role of Inflammatory Biomarkers and Use of Colchicine for Its Prevention

2014· review· en· W2068905702 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jarett Worden, Kwame Kumi Asare

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammasome and immune disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchU.S. Food and Drug Administration
KeywordsColchicineMedicineAtrial fibrillationGoutNonsteroidalInflammationIntensive care medicinePathogenesisInternal medicinePharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common complication following cardiac surgery, occurring in up to 65% of cardiac surgical patients. It is a condition associated with increased morbidity, increased length of hospital stay, and increased health care costs. One of the many potential causes of POAF is postsurgical inflammation, as demonstrated by increased levels of inflammatory biomarkers such as C-reactive protein and interleukin-6. Although still a subject of debate, the role of these inflammatory markers in the pathogenesis of POAF remains under vigorous investigation. Several antiinflammatory drugs have demonstrated promising results in prevention of POAF, including nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, and statins. Colchicine is one of the oldest medications used in modern medicine, typically for the treatment and prevention of gout. New evidence has recently surfaced that colchicine may also be useful in the prevention of POAF. In recent studies, colchicine has demonstrated both safety and efficacy in the prevention of POAF. Several new studies are currently being initiated that may further elucidate colchicine's role in the prevention of POAF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug TherapySame topicInflammasome and immune disordersFrench-language works237,207