MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068923426 · doi:10.5539/jas.v3n1p170

Yield Response of Uniculm Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to Early and Late Application of Nitrogen: Flag Leaf Development and Senescence

2011· article· en· W2068923426 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Santosh Kumari

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCrop Yield and Soil Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimordiumAnthesisNitrate reductaseNitrogenAgronomyBiologyGrain yieldNitrogen assimilationHorticultureChemistryCultivarGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nitrogen (N) supply increased flag leaf area by increasing cell number. N promoted initiation and developmentof floret primordia. N availability upto ear emergence affected fertile floret number more than spikelet numberand increased the number of grains. Late application of nitrogen at 5 days after anthesis increased percentagenitrogen in grains, grain weight and grain number due to its effect on ability of floret to set grain. Larger numberof florets and grains provided sink not only for carbon but also for nitrogen accumulation with high nitrogenavailability. The accumulation of grain protein depended on the accumulation and partitioning of reduced Naccumulated during the vegetative stage of growth and the relative contributions of nitrate assimilation and Nredistribution during grain development in low as well as high nitrogen supply. Flag leaf of ‘Gigas’ wheatretained the ability to synthesize RuBPCO on induction of nitrate reductase by substrate supply at post anthesisstage. The reductions in proteolytic enzymes were coincident with loss of Chl, total soluble protein and nitratereductase activity from the flag leaves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicCrop Yield and Soil FertilityFrench-language works237,207