MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068927737 · doi:10.1139/e04-053

Braincase structure of the Middle Jurassic theropod dinosaur<i>Piatnitzkysaurus</i>

2004· article· en· W2068927737 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Oliver W. M. Rauhut

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatureDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsGeologyAutapomorphyPaleontologyTheropodaAnatomySynapomorphyFossaBiologyTaxonPhylogenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The braincase of the Middle Jurassic basal tetanuran theropod Piatnitzkysaurus floresi is described in detail. It exhibits several probable autapomorphic characters of this taxon, including the extremely shortened and narrow basipterygoid processes, the presence of parasphenoid recesses that seem to communicate with each other, and basipterygoid recesses that are approximately as long anteroposteriorly as they are high. The braincase of Piatnitzkysaurus shows two possible synapomorphies with the enigmatic European Middle Jurassic theropod Piveteausaurus, a subrectangular pituitary fossa that is wider than high and the transverse span between the basipterygoid processes being smaller than the width of the basal tubera. A noteworthy aspect of the braincase of Piatnitzkysaurus is the high number of accessory pneumatic recesses, which indicates that the presence of an anterior and dorsal tympanic recess, and possibly also of subcondylar and basipterygoid recesses is plesiomorphic for tetanurans. In contrast, the bones enclosing the brain (e.g., laterosphenoid, prootic, supraoccipital) are very massive and lack internal pneumatic chambers, as they are present in later tetanurans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFrench-language works237,207