Hip arthroplasty: periprosthetic fracture in the femur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Imaging description Periprosthetic fractures involving the femur in the setting of hip arthroplasty are not rare. Periprosthetic acetabular fractures in the setting of arthroplasty are rare. Periprosthetic femur fractures are classified using the Vancouver classification system since it is reproducible and helps determine the type of treatment to be used. Fractures can occur at or about the femoral component or distal to the femoral component (Figure 53.1). They are readily detected on radiographs. A faint longitudinal linear lucency seen about the femoral stem tip in the immediate post-operative period may represent an artifact or longitudinal fracture; however, it can be treated conservatively (Figure 53.2). Importance Lesser trochanter and greater trochanter periprosthetic fractures are usually treated conservatively while femoral shaft perihardware fractures are treated with reduction and internal fixation (as long as the prosthesis is not loose). If there is hardware loosening present in addition to the fracture, then a revision arthoplasty with or without a graft is performed. A faint longitudinal linear lucency seen about the femoral stem tip in the immediate post-operative period may represent an artifact; however, it can be treated conservatively as well. Typical clinical scenario A 70-year-old female with a history of a right total hip arthroplasty 4 months ago presents with sudden onset of hip and right leg pain after a fall. She is unable to bear weight on the right leg. Radiographs demonstrate a femoral shaft fracture about the femoral stem of the right hip prosthesis. There is no evidence of perihardware loosening, and she has no clinical evidence of infection. The fracture was treated with reduction and interval fixation. Teaching point Trochanteric periprosthetic fractures are usually treated conservatively. Femoral shaft periprosthetic fractures in well-fixed prostheses usually require reduction and internal fixation with or without a graft. Loosened prostheses with a femoral shaft fracture generally require a revision arthroplasty. A faint longitudinal linear lucency seen about the femoral stem tip in the immediate postoperative period may represent an artifact; however, it can be treated conservatively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".