Local Buckling Behavior of X100 Linepipes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Local buckling behavior of API 5L X100 grade linepipes subjected to axial compression and/or bending moment is discussed in this paper based on results obtained by finite element analyses. Yield-to-tensile strength (Y/T) ratio and design factor were taken into account in the finite element analyses in order to discuss their effects on the local buckling behavior. The local bucking behavior of such lower strength linepipes as X60 and X80 grade linepipes is also discussed for comparison. Two-dimensional solid elements and four-node shell elements were used for the finite element modeling of the linepipes subjected to axial compression and bending moment, respectively. The study has improved the understanding of local buckling behavior of the X100 grade linepipes and observed the following trends. When a linepipe is subjected to axial compression, the critical axial stress decreases with increasing design factor and Y/T ratio. However, the nominal critical strain increases with increasing design factor and decreasing Y/T ratio. When a linepipe is subjected to bending moment, the critical bending moment decreases with increasing design factor and Y/T ratio. Similarly, the nominal critical strain increases with increasing design factor. However, the nominal critical strain increases with decreasing Y/T ratio when the design factor is less than and equal to 0.6 and decreases with decreasing Y/T ratio when the design factor is equal to 0.8.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".