Molecular Orbital Studies of Gas-Phase Interactions between Complex Molecules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Describing interactions among large molecules theoretically is a challenging task. As an example, we investigated gas-phase interactions between a linear nonionic oligomer and various model compounds (cofactors), which have been reported to associate experimentally, using PM3 semiempirical molecular orbital theory. As oligomer, we studied the hexamer of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO), and as cofactors, we studied corilagin and related compounds containing phenolic groups (R-OH). These systems are of interest because they are models for PEO/cofactor flocculation systems, used in industrial applications. The PM3 delocalized molecular orbitals (DLMO) describe the bonding between (PEO)6 and cofactors, and some of them cover the complete complex. The DLMOs which cover the traditionally considered hydrogen bonds R-OH...O or R-CH...O show a distinct "pinch", a decrease of the electron density, between the H...O atoms. Calculations of Gibbs free energy, entropy, and enthalpy show that the PEO/cofactor complexes do not form at room temperature, because the loss of entropy exceeds the increase in enthalpy. The change in enthalpy is linearly related to the change in entropy for the different complexes. Even though bond lengths, bond angles, DLMOs, and electron densities for the PEO/cofactor complexes are consistent with the definition of hydrogen bonds, the number of intermolecular R-OH...O and R-CH...O bonds does not correlate with the enthalpy of association, indicating that the bonding mechanism for these systems is the sum of many small contributions of many delocalized orbitals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".