MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PTEN mutations and evolving concepts in endometrial neoplasia

2002· review· en· W2069051208 on OpenAlexaff
Eleanor Latta, William Chapman

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPTENCancer researchMicrosatellite instabilityCarcinomaEndometrial cancerMedicineOncologyBiologyPathologyInternal medicineGeneCancerPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayGeneticsApoptosisAlleleMicrosatellite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several recent advances have been made in our understanding of the pathogenesis of endometrial tumours, particularly endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC). Mutations in the PTEN gene and microsatellite instability (MSI) are common genetic abnormalities in EECs, and distinguish these lesions from other histological subtypes of endometrial carcinoma. Endometrial precancers are monoclonal lesions that share a common genetic lineage with invasive EEC, including PTEN mutations and MSI. Mutations of the PTEN tumour suppressor gene have been identified in histologically normal-appearing endometrium exposed to oestrogen, 18-55% of endometrial precancers and 26-80% of EECs. PTEN has been shown to play several roles in tumour suppression, including cell cycle arrest and promotion of apoptosis. Loss of PTEN function predisposes endometrial cells to neoplastic transformation, particularly in high-oestrogenic states. MSI is another common alteration seen in EECs and endometrial precancers, and some studies have reported an association between MSI and PTEN mutations. The replication error that results in MSI may facilitate the development of PTEN mutations in some, but not all, cases of EEC. The prognostic significance of PTEN gene mutations and MSI in endometrial carcinoma is controversial. Further study is needed to delineate the different pathogenetic pathways of EEC and their natural history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Obstetrics & GynecologySame topicPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerFrench-language works237,207