MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069088959 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am10-4023

Abstract 4023: Novel role of neurofibromin in transport of RNA granules

2010· article· en· W2069088959 on OpenAlexaffabout
Vedant Arun, Joseph Wiley, Zia Karim, Abhijit Guha

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurofibromin 1BiologyDyneinImmunoprecipitationCell biologyMicrotubuleRNAProhibitinRNA editingRNA-binding proteinMolecular biologyNeurofibromatosisMitochondrionGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is the most common tumor predisposing syndrome in humans, with an incidence of 1:3500 live births. Neurofibromin, encoded by Nf1, acts as a p21-Ras-GAP to directly interact with and inactivate p21-Ras, through its’ GAP Related Domain (GRD). Evidence suggests that non-Ras-GAP functions mediated through interactions with domains outside of the GRD are of importance. By making a number of NF1-GST domain constructs coupled with differential Mass Spec analysis, we identified LRPPRC and Dynein as previously unreported NF1-TBD interacting proteins. LRPPRC was of interest as it is mutated in the Leigh Syndrome French Canadian (LSFC) variant, a cytochrome-oxidase deficiency syndrome, characterized by neurodegeneration, developmental- mental- and growth-retardation, thereby having some similarities with non-tumor manifestations of NF1. We have established that LRPPRC and neurofibromin interact in vitro by immunoprecipitation and reverse bait immunoprecipitation. Use of a novel Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA) was used to further confirm the interaction in situ in cell lines and clinical tissue cryosections. Towards elucidating the functional relevance of the interaction, we have established that the two proteins complex with microtubules and motor proteins, which indicates a role in microtubule-dependant intracellular transport. Since LRPPRC binds with mRNA and is involved in its nucleocytosolic shuttling, we hypothesize that the cargo transported by this complex could be RNA granules. Mass Spec analysis of NF1 immunoprecipitates revealed a number of proteins that are a part of the RNA granule complex which include RNA binding proteins and proteins involved in mRNA translation. By performing RNA Immunoprecipitation (RIP) with NF1 and LRPPRC antibodies, we have demonstrated that the two proteins do complex with 18S and 28S rRNA which is indicative of the presence of intact mRNA. Towards identifying the specific messages transported by the NF1-LRPPRC RNA granule complex we are performing RIP - microarray gene expression profiling (CHIP). The resultant candidate mRNAs will be further investigated to understand the importance of this novel interaction and novel mechanism towards some of the overlap of neurological and developmental manifestations between LSFC and NF1. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4023.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207