MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069114759 · doi:10.2118/164504-ms

New Generation of "Green" Defoamers for Challenging Drilling and Cementing Applications

2013· article· en· W2069114759 on OpenAlex
Luciana Bava, A.H. Mahmoudkhani, Robert W. Wilson, Leanne Levy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Production and Operations Symposium · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRisk analysis (engineering)Biochemical engineeringProcess engineeringEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceWaste managementEngineeringBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Increased environmental regulations in the North Sea, US and Canada offshores (OSPAR, US EPA, etc.) call for the use of less toxic and biodegradable chemicals in upstream oilfied applications. Compliance with international and domestic protocols governing use and discharge of oilfield chemicals is a crucial factor in the development of new, environmentally benign additives. To create competitive products, service companies need to re-evaluate their existing product lines and re-formulate with chemistries that must meet not only the standards for the ecotoxicity footprint but also, the technological challenges in oilfields. With increasing offshore production activities, the need to develop efficient technological solutions generates a substantial market for "green" chemical substances. In drilling and cementing applications, the reliable administration of defoaming chemistries is a key step in preventing excessive foaming and avoiding operational difficulties due to entrained air. Traditional products that are used in common operating conditions, often pose a risk to the environment. A new generation of "greener" chemistries is needed either in liquid or solid forms. Solid defoamers represent a particularly attractive alternative, as they are characterized by long term stability and ease of handling under severe climatic conditions. This paper presents the development of "green" technologies that show superior performance when compared to traditional defoamers. Formulated products in liquid and solid forms are evaluated using an advanced analytical approach to optimized performance during simulated field conditions. Based on widely used risk assessment models, these new alternatives offer safe and reliable solutions for slurry design and chemical control of foaming in offshore applications. Examples of severe foaming cases in slurries containing diverse additives are presented and demonstrate the advantage of this "green" technology. The oilfield industry is presently facing several challenges both from stricter environmental restrictions and also from specific field application requirements. The focus on finding suitable replacement additives for cementing and drilling systems without compromising the properties of completion fluids is a priority for many oil service companies. The studied "green" defoamers are less toxic and easily biodegradable thus providing new environmentally responsible and cost-effective additives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it