Dynamic stromal‐epithelial interactions during progression of MCF10DCIS.com xenografts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MCF10DCIS.com cells form comedo type ductal carcinoma in situ in immune-deficient mice before forming invasive ductal carcinoma. As the lesions mature, both stromal and epithelial cells undergo phenotypic changes detected by immunohistochemistry. Myofibroblasts are present before the formation of carcinoma in situ and after development of invasive carcinoma. MCF10DCIS. com lesions develop a myoepithelial layer prior to exhibiting a basement membrane surrounding the ductal mass. TGFbeta1 is initially expressed by the epithelial cells but is expressed by stroma in invasive carcinoma. Stromal derived factor-1 is detected in epithelial cells in early carcinoma in situ but is produced in stromal cells in invasive carcinoma. The receptor CXCR4 is expressed by epithelial cells in the xenografts at all times, as is the hepatocyte growth factor receptor c-met. MCF10DCIS.com xenografts illustrate the dynamic interplay of epithelium and stroma in the development of carcinoma in situ and subsequent invasive carcinoma. Although the phenotype of the epithelial cells may be dependent upon the stroma, the malignant epithelium induces the development of the stroma necessary for progression to the invasive stage. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".