Basal ornithopod (Dinosauria: Ornithischia) teeth from the Prince Creek Formation (early Maastrichtian) of Alaska
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A diverse and prolific record of polar dinosaurs comes from the Upper Cretaceous (Campanian–Maastrichtian) sediments of the Prince Creek Formation exposed on Alaska’s North Slope. Previous assignment of basal ornithopod material from this formation has been based solely on teeth, which have either been referred to “hypsilophodontid” indet. or Thescelosaurus sp. Here, we re-examine this material and describe several new specimens, including five isolated premaxillary teeth and three cheek teeth. The premaxillary teeth are most similar to those of Thescelosaurus , whereas the cheek teeth are more similar to its sister taxon Parksosaurus , for which premaxillary teeth are unknown. Referral of this new material to Thescelosaurus would represent the oldest occurrence of this taxon and considerably extend its stratigraphic range. A more likely possibility is that the premaxillary teeth are referable to Parksosaurus, an interpretation that is more parsimonious from a stratigraphic perspective. Intriguingly, one cheek tooth previously referred to as “hypsilophodontid” cannot be referred to either Thescelosaurus or Parksosaurus. Previously, faunal comparisons of the Prince Creek Formation have largely been made with non-contemporaneous formations, including the Campanian-aged Judith River and Aguja formations, or to the latest Maastrichtian Hell Creek Formation. On the basis of age and faunal similarities, a more appropriate comparison should be made with coeval rocks of the Horseshoe Canyon. This study expands our knowledge of Cretaceous ornithischian diversity at polar paleolatitudes and underscores the importance of small, rare, or easily misidentified fossils in paleoecological studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".