MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069209583 · doi:10.1086/373996

Assessment in Mice of the Therapeutic Potential of Tailored, Multivalent Shiga Toxin Carbohydrate Ligands

2003· article· en· W2069209583 on OpenAlexafffund
George L. Mulvey, Paola Marcato, Pavel I. Kitov, Joanna Sadowska, David R. Bundle, Glen D. Armstrong

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEscherichia coli research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsShiga toxinStarfishMicrobiologySTX2Escherichia coliReceptorChemistryToxinPharmacologyBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The therapeutic potential of 2 soluble multivalent receptor-based inhibitors of Shiga toxin (Stx) 1 and Stx2 was determined in mice. One of these, Starfish, protected mice when it was injected subcutaneously in admixture with a lethal dose of Stx1 but not Stx2. Starfish also reduced the distribution of (125)I-Stx1 but not (125)I-Stx2 to the murine kidney and brain. A modified version of Starfish, called "Daisy," in which the Stx alpha Gal(1,4)beta Gal(1,4)beta Glc receptors were installed on the core glucose structure via a modified tethering strategy, protected mice against both Stx1 and Stx2. Daisy also protected streptomycin-treated mice from Escherichia coli O91:H21 and did not interfere with the ability of the murine immune system to produce Stx-specific protective antibodies. These results extend the possibility of using soluble carbohydrate-based receptor inhibitors to prevent Stx-mediated complications arising from infections with enterohemorrhagic E. coli serotypes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.515
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations157
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicEscherichia coli research studiesFrench-language works237,207