Fungal populations in subcrown internodes and crowns of oat crops in Saskatchewan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Discoloration of subcrown internodes (SIs) and crowns/lower culms (CLCs) of 87 oat crops across Saskatchewan in 1998-1999 and of SIs in 31 oat crops in eastern Saskatchewan (Black Soil Zone) in 2000-2001 was evaluated. Fungi in discolored tissue were isolated, identified and quantified, and the percentage of fields from which each fungus was isolated at least once (occurrence) and their relative percentage isolation levels were determined. In the 1998-1999 survey, discoloration severity varied more between years than among soil zones. Fusarium was the most common genus present, and F. culmorum the most common species. This was followed by F. equiseti, Microdochium bolleyi, Cochliobolus sativus, and F. avenaceum. Levels of C. sativus were lower in oat than those reported for wheat and barley in parallel province-wide surveys. Percentage isolation of F. culmorum was higher in the Brown than in the Black/Dark Gray Soil Zone, whereas the percentage occurrence of F. avenaceum was highest in the Black/Dark Gray Soil Zone. In 2000-2001, in eastern Saskatchewan, M. bolleyi, F. avenaceum, C. sativus, F. equiseti, Alternaria spp., and Pyrenophora avenae were the most common fungi isolated from discolored oat SIs. Similar to reports from wheat and barley, F. graminearum was isolated from SIs in eastern Saskatchewan at low levels. For the most part, neither previous crop nor tillage system affected fungal levels in SIs. P. avenae levels increased when the previous crop was another oat rather than wheat or barley. We conclude that oat could maintain or increase inoculum levels of Fusarium pathogens that cause damage to cereal crops in Saskatchewan. This is supported by results from a crop residue study in eastern Saskatchewan that showed that F. avenaceum, F. culmorum and F. graminearum occurred at similar or higher levels in oat fields than in fields of wheat or barley. Key words: Oat, root rot, crown rot, crop rotation, tillage system, Fusarium head blight, Fusarium spp., Fusarium avenaceum, Fusarium culmorum, Fusarium graminearum, Cochliobolus sativus, Pyrenophora avenae
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".