MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Advanced Nutrition: Macronutrients, 2nd Edition

2001· article· en· W2069261066 on OpenAlexaff
Kathy Keiver

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubject (documents)Library scienceSection (typography)GerontologyMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advanced Nutrition: Macronutrients, 2nd Edition Author: BERDANIER, Carolyn D., Ph.D. (Univ. of Georgia), Bibliographic Data: (ISBN: 0-8493-8735-3, CRC Press, Inc., 2000, $99.95) 6 chapters, 327 pages, hard cover Audiences: Nutrition Students, Nutritionists Subjects: Nutrition, Biochemistry, Physiology Other Info: The book contains black-and-white illustrations., Reviewed by: Kathy Keiver, Ph.D. , (University of British Columbia) DESCRIPTION: The author of this book covers the basic structure, function, and detailed metabolism of the macronutrients energy and water. She also includes detailed information regarding the interaction between the nutrients and genetics. This is the second edition of the book; the first edition was published in 1994. PURPOSE: The purpose is to explain, review, and explore present knowledge and recent trends, developments, and advances in nutrition. This is a worthy objective, but not always met. For example, a discussion regarding the formulation of the DRIs is lacking (although the history of the formulation of RDAs is covered), as is discussion about the role of fiber in health and the controversies surrounding the use of glycemic index in the management of diabetes. The section on alcohol contains little new information from this field. AUDIENCE: According to the author, this book is written for a scholarly audience but is thought to be of interest to the educated layman. The book is more suited to a scholarly audience. The author is a credible authority on much of the subject matter of this book. ASSESSMENT: This book is most suitable as a reference book, although sometimes information is hidden in unexpected sections, making it difficult to find. In particular, it contains detailed information regarding nutrient/gene interactions. SCORE: Weighted Numerical Score: 70 - ***

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1870.164

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207