Combined Effects of Stress Concentration and Fatigue on the Reliability of Notched Laminates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Composite laminates are used in structural applications such as aircraft wings and tail structures. Drilling holes and making cutouts in these laminates are unavoidable for practical reasons. As a result, stress concentration is introduced near the hole or cutout, and the load-bearing capacity of the structure is reduced. In addition, composite laminates used in aerospace applications are subjected to considerable fatigue loading due to service conditions. In composite laminates, fatigue causes reduction in stiffness and strength. The objective of the present work is to study the combined effect of stress concentration and fatigue on the composite laminate. Since composite laminate displays significant variation in material and strength properties, the stress distribution in the laminate is stochastic in nature. It is more appropriate to analyze the notched composite laminates using a stochastic approach and to design the laminate based on a reliability-based design approach. In the present work, such an approach is developed and the combined effect of stress concentration and fatigue on the reliability of the laminate is investigated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".