MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069273809 · doi:10.4088/jcp.v65n0718

Alcohol Use Disorder Comorbidity in Eating Disorders

2004· article· en· W2069273809 on OpenAlexaff
Cynthia M. Bulik, Kelly L. Klump, Laura M. Thornton, Allan S. Kaplan, Bernie Devlin, Manfred M. Fichter, Katherine A. Halmi, Michael Strober, D. Blake Woodside, Scott J. Crow, James E. Mitchell, Alessandro Rotondo, Mauro Mauri, Giovanni B. Cassano, Pamela K. Keel, Wade H. Berrettini, Walter H. Kaye

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnorexia nervosaBulimia nervosaComorbidityImpulsivityPerfectionism (psychology)Eating disordersPsychologyPsychiatryClinical psychologyPersonality disordersBorderline personality disorderAlcohol use disorderAnxietyBinge-eating disorderBarratt Impulsiveness ScalePersonalityAlcohol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Eating disorders and alcohol use disorders (AUDs) commonly co-occur, although the patterns of comorbidity differ by eating disorder subtype. Our aim was to explore the nature of the co-morbid relation between AUDs and eating disorders in a large and phenotypically well-characterized group of individuals. METHOD: We compared diagnostic and personality profiles of 97 women with lifetime anorexia nervosa only, 282 women with lifetime bulimia nervosa only, and 293 women with a lifetime history of both anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa or anorexia nervosa with binge eating (ANBN) (DSM-IV criteria). All individuals were participants in a multicenter study of the genetics of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. We explored pattern of onset, Axis I and II comorbidity, and personality characteristics of individuals with and without AUDs by eating disorder subtype. Personality characteristics were assessed with the Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale, the Temperament and Character Inventory, and the Barratt Impulsivity Scale. RESULTS: Alcohol use disorders were significantly more prevalent in women with ANBN and bulimia nervosa than in women with anorexia nervosa (p =.0001). The majority of individuals reported primary onset of the eating disorder, with only one third reporting the onset of the AUD first. After eating disorder subtype was controlled for, AUDs were associated with the presence of major depressive disorder, a range of anxiety disorders, and cluster B personality disorder symptoms. In addition, individuals with AUDs presented with personality profiles marked by impulsivity and perfectionism. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with eating disorders and AUDs exhibit phenotypic profiles characterized by both anxious, perfectionistic traits and impulsive, dramatic dispositions. These traits mirror the pattern of control and dyscontrol seen in individuals with this comorbid profile and suggest that anxiety modulation may be related to alcohol use in this group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations242
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Clinical PsychiatrySame topicEating Disorders and BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207