MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069289957 · doi:10.1093/icvts/ivu276.68

068-I * CLINICAL AND HAEMODYNAMIC OUTCOMES IN 804 PATIENTS RECEIVING THE FREEDOM SOLO STENTLESS AORTIC VALVE: RESULTS FROM AN INTERNATIONAL PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTRE STUDY

2014· article· en· W2069289957 on OpenAlexaffabout
Herko Grubitzsch, S. Wang, K. Matschke, Mattia Glauber, David Heimansohn, Edward Tan, Katrien François, Markus Thalmann

Bibliographic record

VenueInteractive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalAlberta Hospital Edmonton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAortic valveSurgeryEndocarditisAortic valve replacementProspective cohort studyHazard ratioConcomitantHemodynamicsCardiologyConfidence intervalInternal medicineStenosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: The aim of this prospective, non-randomised, multicentre trial was to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Freedom SOLO valve. Methods: From March 2009 to February 2013, a total of 804 consecutive patients (mean age 74.6 ± 6.3 years; 45.1% females; 91.4% in NYHA class II–III) underwent aortic valve replacement in 30 centres in Europe (18) and North America (6 US, 6 Canada). The cumulative follow-up was 1102 patient-years (mean 16.5 ± 10.8 months; range: 0–40.5 months). A total of 376 patients underwent concomitant procedures, with the majority of procedures being CABG (264 patients). Results: Sixty-four patients died (14 early, 50 late); 12 deaths (1 early, 11 late) were classified as valve-related. The actuarial freedom from valve-related death was 99.0%, 98.8%, 98.3% and 95.5% at 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. At 3 years, hazard rates were 1.55%/patient-year for endocarditis, 0.73%/patient-year for non-structural valve dysfunction, 0.55%/patient-year for SVD, 1.27%/patient-year for major thromboembolisms, 1.73%/patient-year for valve explants. No cases of valve thrombosis were observed. NYHA class I and II was observed in 95.7%, 97%, 95.5% and 91.4% of patients at 3–6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years postoperatively, respectively. Mean gradients and increase in effective orifice area for each valve size were stable over the follow-up period (Table 1). The mean left ventricular mass index decreased from 137.6 g/m2 at discharge to 127.1 g/m2 at 3–6 months, 121.8 g/m2 at 12 months, 120.5 g/m2 and 126.4 g/m2 at 2 and 3 years. Postoperative echocardiographic data by valve size Conclusion: The excellent clinical and haemodynamic results confirm the safety and effectiveness of the Freedom SOLO valve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInteractive Cardiovascular and Thoracic SurgerySame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207