An analysis of fluctuations in supercooled TIP4P/2005 water
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Large-scale, long-time molecular dynamics simulations are used to investigate fluctuations in the TIP4P/2005 water model in the supercooled region (240-190 K). Particular attention is focused in the vicinity of a previously reported liquid-liquid critical point [J. L. F. Abascal and C. Vega, J. Chem. Phys. 133, 234502 (2010)]. Water is viewed as an equimolar binary mixture with "species" defined based on a local tetrahedral order parameter. A Bhatia-Thornton fluctuation analysis is used to show that species concentration fluctuations couple to density fluctuations and completely account for the anomalous increase in the structure factor at small wave number observed under supercooled conditions. Although we find that both concentration and density fluctuations increase with decreasing temperature along the proposed critical isochore, we cannot confirm the existence of a liquid-liquid critical point. Our simulations suggest that the parameters previously reported are not a true liquid-liquid critical point and we find no evidence of two-phase coexistence in its vicinity. It is shown that very long simulations (on the order of 8 μs for 500 molecules) are necessary to obtain well converged density distributions for deeply supercooled water and this is especially important if one is seeking direct evidence of a two-phase region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".