MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069301542

An Experimental Investigation Into the Flow of Marble

2010· book· en· W2069301542 on OpenAlexaff
Frank D. Adams, John Thomas Nicolson

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew) · 2010
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrustGeologyCataclastic rockGeophysicsHadeanPaleontologyTectonics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

That rocks under the conditions to which they are subjected in many parts of the earth’s crust become bent and twisted in the most complicated manner is a fact which was recognised by the earliest geologists, and it needs but a glance at any of the accurate sections of contorted regions of the earth’s crust which have been prepared in more recent years to show not only that in many cases even the hardest rocks have been folded, but that there has often been a marked transfer or “flow” of material from one place to another in the folds. While, however, these facts are undisputed, the manner in which this contortion, with its concomitant flowing, has taken place is matter concerning which there lias been much discussion and a wide divergence ot opinion. Some authorities—among whom Heim* whose work, in Alpine geology must command the admiration of all, may be mentioned—have held that while, in the upper portions of the earth’s crust, rocks, when submitted to pressure, will break, giving rise to faults and overthrusts, the same rocks in the deeper portions of the earth’s crust are unable to break up in this way, owing to the great weight of the superincumbent strata. The lines of fracture become smaller and greatly increase in number, the various minerals constituting the rock thus breaking down into grains, which, however, move around and past one another, the adjacent grains always remaining within the sphere of cohesion. The structure becomes cataclastic ; the rock mass, acting as plastic bodies do, and flowing in the direction of least resistance, maintains its coherence while altering its shape. Heim believes that there is a further stage in the process which he thus describes :— “ Wird die umformende Kraft endlich so gross dass sie anstatt an ein, paar tausend Stellen die Festigkeit durch Bruch aufheben zu konnen, dieselbe in jedem einzelnen Punkte iiberwindet, so wird das Spaltennetz unendlich fein und das Gesteinskorn zur Kleinheit eines Molekules reducirt, d. h. die mechanische Bewegungseinheit ist nicht mehr ein Gesteinsbrocken sondern unendlich klein so dass die Bewegung einecontinuirliche Umformung ohne Bruch wird.’’

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)Same topicGeotechnical and Geomechanical EngineeringFrench-language works237,207