MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069355660 · doi:10.1179/026708304225010299

Measurements of residual strains and stresses in laser formed plates of Ti-6Al-4V using synchrotron X-ray diffraction

2004· article· en· W2069355660 on OpenAlexaff
J. R. Cho, Sammy Tin, R.C. Reed

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Science and Technology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser and Thermal Forming Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceSynchrotronDiffractionResidual stressOpticsTitanium alloyLaserTransverse planeDistortion (music)Indentation hardnessX-rayUltimate tensile strengthX-ray crystallographyComposite materialAlloyMicrostructureStructural engineeringOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The synchrotron X-ray diffraction technique is used to examine the development of residual strains in laser formed plates of the α - β titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. The following conditions were studied: (A) one pass of the laser beam; (B) three passes with intervals of 10 s between scans; (C) three passes but with 90 s intervals; (D) five passes with 10 s intervals; and (E) five passes with 90 s intervals. Measurements were made in both the longitudinal and transverse directions using the {1013} and {1120} lattice planes. The sample with five passes and 90 s intervals exhibited the largest residual stresses in the longitudinal direction, and the sample with a single pass had the lowest. The width of the zone of tensile strain was largest in the sample with five passes at 10 s intervals; next was the sample with three passes at 10 s intervals. Optical microscopy and microhardness tests demonstrated that the temperature-time history associated with condition D was sufficient to partially anneal the material, and hence low strains were observed. Needle probe distortion measurements showed that condition D resulted in the largest distortion angle (∼7.0°) while the smallest distortion (∼0.4°) was observed after condition A.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials Science and TechnologySame topicLaser and Thermal Forming TechniquesFrench-language works237,207